Insights

Every European cosmetic, detergent or paint formulator applying for the EU Ecolabel runs into the same wall. The reference document — the Detergent Ingredients Database (DID list) — is organized partly by chemical family and partly by substance, with no clear guidance on which is which. Formulators work from CAS numbers on their Safety Data Sheets; the Ecolabel criteria refer to DID entries. The bridge between the two exists nowhere officially. Each company ends up rebuilding its own mapping, inconsistently, dossier after dossier.

What if formulators could access the same quality of environmental and toxicological data as large corporations — without the months of manual research? EcoCalc® consolidates 21 expert-validated databases into a single platform, turning weeks of data collection into hours of actionable insight.

If you've worked at the intersection of Life Cycle Assessment and chemical Risk Assessment, you've probably heard this debate: 👉 LCA practitioners think RA misses the bigger picture : cumulative effects of thousands of chemicals and long-term low-dose impacts that single-substance assessment cannot capture. 👉 Risk assessors argue USEtox scores have no proven link to actual human & ecosystem harm—and that only substance-by-substance RA can truly protect human health and the environment.